https://members.aol.com/alanyu5/e-weapon.htm


Informant: Mark Marks



https://home.comcast.net/~jmontemayor10/_disc3/0000005b.htm

As your walking your Dog down the road, a thief or one who hates you, scans your pet Id, he then can do what shelters do to find your home and number. Maybe thats another reason for the implant, not so that you can find your pet but, so big brother can find you.

If my pet is found, how does the shelter know to contact me? When a shelter finds a pet with a microchip they will call AVID. If the pet is registered with AVlD's recovery network, PETtrac, the shelter will be given the owner's name. If the pet is not registered, they will be given the name of the veterinarian who injected the microchip. The veterinarian will provide the owner's latest information.

https://www.avidid.com/faq/index.html questions and answers page

One Pet collar Id never have is a Pet GPS collar
https://gps.engadget.com/entry/1376263394094606

And whats to keep your local kidnapper from giving your kid a GPS watch, would you know it if he or she did, maybe, how can you tell a GPS Watch from a not-GPSwatch ????

What about the vehicle tracking systems? Who do you realy want tracking your car every place you go?? Who ?? Are you shure thats who is using this technology?

Tell me your secret. How do you stop your local freak from using a air-rifle to shot your dog with a GPS device and find out where you live?

Ever improving technology allows GPS receivers to become smaller and less noticeable, making them easier to hide in a vehicle or be inconspicuous on a child. Which ever brand or model you select, you'll have the uncomfort of knowing that locating almost anything is just a few keystrokes away.

GPS Tracking Devices
Speed & Distance Timex GPS Watch
Cell Phones with GPS


Informant: Mark Marks

I have been saying for years on these forums that the perps have some way of eliminating oxytocin from our body chemistry. This causes us to alienate from people and other people to alienate from us. Now there is some solid research providing a solid foundatioin for why oxytocin is so important to human bonding.

Susan

https://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/T/TRUST_HORMONE?SITE=AZMES&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

Subliminal messages can affect our brains, researchers find
https://www.world-science.net/othernews/050516_sublimfrm.htm


Informant: susan

These are laws passed in 2004 relating to electronic weapons. The source pages are listed below each section. I am reseraching these and there are others that I will distribute and post online as I find them. The following relates to the State of MASSACHUSETTS.

I know of Michigan. There is one from Caifornia that is only indirectly related. If anyone knows of any others, let me know and I will post them all in one location for everyone to access.

Liza



GENERAL LAWS OF MASSACHUSETTS
PART I.
ADMINISTRATION OF THE GOVERNMENT
TITLE XX. PUBLIC SAFETY AND GOOD ORDER
CHAPTER 140. LICENSES
SALE OF FIREARMS

Chapter 140: Section 131J Sale or possession of electrical weapons; penalties

[ Text of section effective until July 15, 2004. For text effective July 15, 2004, see below.]

Section 131J. No person shall sell, offer for sale or possess a portable device or weapon from which an electrical current, impulse, wave or beam may be directed, which current, impulse, wave or beam is designed to incapacitate temporarily, injure or kill.

Whoever violates the provisions of this section shall be punished by a fine of not less than five hundred nor more than one thousand dollars or by imprisonment for not less than six months nor more than two years in a jail or house of correction, or both.

[ Text of section as amended by 2004, 170, Sec. 1 effective July 15, 2004. For text effective until July 15, 2004, see above.]

Section 131J. No person shall possess a portable device or weapon from which an electrical current, impulse, wave or beam may be directed, which current, impulse, wave or beam is designed to incapacitate temporarily, injure or kill, except: (1) a federal, state or municipal law enforcement officer, or member of a special reaction team in a state prison or designated special operations or tactical team in a county correctional facility, acting in the discharge of his official duties who has completed a training course approved by the secretary of public safety in the use of such a devise or weapon designed to incapacitate temporarily; or (2) a supplier of such devices or weapons designed to incapacitate temporarily, if possession of the device or weapon is necessary to the supply or sale of the device or weapon within the scope of such sale or supply enterprise. No person shall sell or offer for sale such device or weapon, except to federal, state or municipal law enforcement agencies. A device or weapon sold under this section shall include a mechanism for tracking the number of times the device or weapon has been fired. The secretary of public safety shall adopt regulations governing who may sell or offer to sell such devices or weapons in the commonwealth and governing law enforcement training on the appropriate use of portable electrical weapons.

Whoever violates this section shall be punished by a fine of not less than $500 nor more than $1,000 or by imprisonment in the house of correction for not less than 6 months nor more than 21/2 years, or by both such fine and imprisonment. A law enforcement officer may arrest without a warrant any person whom he has probable cause to believe has violated this section.

https://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/140-131j.htm



Chapter 170 of the Acts of 2004
AN ACT RELATIVE TO THE POSSESSION OF ELECTRONIC WEAPONS.

Whereas, The deferred operation of this act would tend to defeat its purpose, which is to authorize forthwith certain possession and use of electronic weapons, therefore it is hereby declared to be an emergency law, necessary for the immediate preservation of the public convenience.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:

SECTION 1. Chapter 140 of the General Laws is hereby amended by striking out section 131J, as appearing in the 2002 Official Edition, and inserting in place thereof the following section:-

Section 131J. No person shall possess a portable device or weapon from which an electrical current, impulse, wave or beam may be directed, which current, impulse, wave or beam is designed to incapacitate temporarily, injure or kill, except: (1) a federal, state or municipal law enforcement officer, or member of a special reaction team in a state prison or designated special operations or tactical team in a county correctional facility, acting in the discharge of his official duties who has completed a training course approved by the secretary of public safety in the use of such a device or weapon designed to incapacitate temporarily; or (2) a supplier of such devices or weapons designed to incapacitate temporarily, if possession of the device or weapon is necessary to the supply or sale of the device or weapon within the scope of such sale or supply enterprise. No person shall sell or offer for sale such device or weapon, except to federal, state or municipal law enforcement agencies. A device or weapon sold under this section shall include a mechanism for tracking the number of times the device or weapon has been fired. The secretary of public safety shall adopt regulations governing who may sell or offer to sell such devices or weapons in the commonwealth and governing law enforcement training on the appropriate use of portable electrical weapons.

Whoever violates this section shall be punished by a fine of not less than $500 nor more than $1,000 or by imprisonment in the house of correction for not less than 6 months nor more than 2 1/2 years, or by both such fine and imprisonment. A law enforcement officer may arrest without a warrant any person whom he has probable cause to believe has violated this section.

SECTION 2. The secretary of public safety shall develop a uniform protocol directing state police and municipal police officers to collect data pursuant to this act. Such data shall include the number of times the device or weapon has been fired and the identifying characteristics, including the race and gender, of the individuals who have been fired upon. Not later than 1 year after the effective date of this act, the secretary of public safety shall transmit the necessary data to a university in the commonwealth with experience in the analysis of such data, for annual preparation of an analysis and report of its findings. The secretary shall forthwith transmit the university's annual report to the department of the attorney general, the department of state police, the Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association, the executive office of public safety and the clerks of the house of representatives and the senate.

Approved July 15, 2004.

https://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/seslaw04/sl040170.htm


Informant: Susan

https://www.rhfweb.com/

Surveillance & Mind Control Counter Measure Help Advice]
[Radiation Health References and Information] [Comments to Global Organizations]

The Radiation Health Foundation (RHF) is being reorganized under a new company trust [Star Haven Community Services © ] posted at
https://www.rhfweb.com/sh .

Radiation Health References and Information:

* Please note much of the information posted below is based on purely logical and mathematical speculations and have not been proven or tested with experimental equipment and test results. The information is intended to encourage new mathematical and computational models which may encourage new theories and experiments based on them.


Informant: STEAVE

Although I don't agree with everything on this page it provides many links of interest to the curious researcher

https://www.electrogravity.com/EGTESTS.htm


From marks_mind_control_page

I previously explained why group stalking does not come within the definition of the crime of stalking under California law. This and other state stalking laws that I have seen require a repeated course of conduct by a person. Single acts of harassment by a group of people do not meet this definition.

However, I just looked at the Canadian law. It is different enough to at least give you an argument that a single act of harassment in Canada comes within the definition of stalking:

s264. (1) No person shall, without lawful authority and knowing that another person is harassed or recklessly as to whether the other person is harassed, engage in conduct referred to in subsection (2) that causes that other person reasonably, in all the circumstances, to fear for their safety or the safety of anyone known to them.

(2) The conduct mentioned in subsection (1) consists of
(a) repeatedly following from place to place the other person or anyone known to them;
b) repeatedly communicating with, either directly or indirectly, the other person or anyone known to them;
(c) besetting or watching the dwelling-house, or place where the other person, or anyone known to them, resides, works, carries on business or happens to be; or
(d) engaging in threatening conduct directed at the other person or any member of their family.

To establish guilt of a crime, a prosecutor must establish the existence of each ELEMENT of the crime. There are two elements to the crime of stalking. The first element in Canada is that the defendant has engaged in any one of the four forms of harmful conduct listed in subsection (2) above.

California and other states require a REPEATED COURSE of harmful conduct by a person to satisfy the first element, but in the Canadian statute, notice that the word "repeatedly" is used in subsections (a) and (b) but not in (c) and (d).

A single act of watching the target's home or office or a single act of threatening conduct can thus satisfy the first element of the crime of stalking under Canadian law. You don't need to allege repeated acts by the same person. I don't know of any state law like this.

The second element of the crime of stalking under both Canadian and U.S. state law is that the prohibited conduct must cause the person reasonably to fear for his or her safety. This normally means a fear for physical safety.

The law does not say that the fear must be of harm from one person. You can reasonably fear harm from a group of persons because of an act by one person who is a member of the group. For instance, if you see a Mafia man watching your home, you would reasonably fear physical harm from the Mafia organization, not just from the watcher. For this purpose, you can bring in the stalking gang. The stalking of one person puts you in reasonable fear of harm by the stalking gang.

You probably don't see anyone watching your home. Do you see anything that police would consider a threatening act? Police will interpret "threatening act" to mean a threat of physical harm, but the law does not contain this limitation. You can argue that any harassing act is a threatening act. It is a threat of continuing harm to your emotional health by continuing harassment of a group of stalkers of which the threatening stalker is a member.

This is stretching the Canadian law to try to apply it to our situation. I your police really want to help, Canadian law gives them something to work with. If they don't want to help, they won't accept the argument. They will interpret "threatening act" to mean a threat of physical harm.

It's worth a try in Canada, but I don't know of any U.S. state law under which this argument could be made.

I'm all in favor of making police reports and of recommending to police your method of identifying stalkers. I would like to see all targets making repeated police reports so that police can't keep pretending ignorance of what is happening.

However we can't get police to take reports unless we report facts that constitute crimes as defined by law. There is a way to report the crimes of group stalkers instead of reporting separate harassment acts of separate stalkers, which are not recognized as crimes. I'll get to that subject next.

I'm trying to curb my habit of writing so much at a time that nobody reads it. The subject of establishing our right to police protection deserves a lot of thought and analysis. So I'm doing a part at a time and hoping to arouse some interest and discussion as I go along.

Bob


From Susan

A new particle size carrier is now to be seriously considered as a potential psychotronic carrier.

Like previously discussed Neutrinos, Muons are small enough to allows very hight resolution, that is at the neurotransmitters level. Moreover, there are equally ground and metal penetrating.

Finally, the newly commissioned nuclear attack submarine USS Jimmy Carter (SSN23) is known to be able to tap undersea cables and eavesdrop on the communications passing through them. Psychotronic technologies must not be excluded !

Below is an excerpt from Spacewar.com:

In the late 1960s, Luis Alvarez, a Nobel physics laureate from the University of California, Berkeley placed muon detectors in a tunnel beneath the Great Pyramid of Chefren in Egypt in search of hidden burial chambers. None were discovered.

Closer to home, scientists at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico have been exploring the use of muon radiography to detect illicit nuclear materials in cargo containers or trucks. Existing X-ray devices, already being deployed at ports and border crossings, cannot readily detect a well-shielded cache of highly enriched uranium, material that could be used in a devastating nuclear bomb.

Newer scanning methods, using either dual-beam X-rays or neutrons, can pose radiation hazards to security personnel or illegal immigrants who might stow away in a container.


Related Link:
Muon Opportunists: Detecting The Unseen With Natural Probes.
https://www.spacewar.com/news/terrorwar-05i.html


Informant: colonel_yuri

Book review by Elana Freeland

Unshackled: A Survivor’s Story of Mind Control

by Kathleen Sullivan

Tempe AZ: Dandelion Books, 2003

https://www.mkzine.com/Essays/Book-Survivors%20Story.html


Informant: Mark Marks